Display options
Cite
Strong EA, De Castro R, Sambuco D, et al. Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(12):1596-603doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2521-2.
Strong, E. A., De Castro, R., Sambuco, D., Stewart, A., Ubel, P. A., Griffith, K. A., & Jagsi, R. (2013). Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors. Journal of general internal medicine, 28(12), 1596-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2521-2
Strong, Erin A, et al. "Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors." Journal of general internal medicine vol. 28,12 (2013): 1596-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2521-2
Strong EA, De Castro R, Sambuco D, Stewart A, Ubel PA, Griffith KA, Jagsi R. Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Dec;28(12):1596-603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2521-2. Epub 2013 Jun 14. PMID: 23765289; PMCID: PMC3832709.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Dec;28(12):1596-603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2521-2. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

Work-life balance in academic medicine: narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors.

Journal of general internal medicine

Erin A Strong, Rochelle De Castro, Dana Sambuco, Abigail Stewart, Peter A Ubel, Kent A Griffith, Reshma Jagsi

Affiliations

  1. University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

PMID: 23765289 PMCID: PMC3832709 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-013-2521-2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leaders in academic medicine are often selected from the ranks of physician-researchers, whose demanding careers involve multiple professional commitments that must also be balanced with demands at home.

OBJECTIVE: To gain a more nuanced understanding of work-life balance issues from the perspective of a large and diverse group of faculty clinician-researchers and their mentors.

DESIGN: A qualitative study with semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted from 2010 to 2011, using inductive analysis and purposive sampling.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred former recipients of U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) K08 or K23 career development awards and 28 of their mentors.

APPROACH: Three researchers with graduate training in qualitative methods conducted the interviews and thematically coded verbatim transcripts.

KEY RESULTS: Five themes emerged related to work-life balance: (1) the challenge and importance of work-life balance for contemporary physician-researchers, (2) how gender roles and spousal dynamics make these issues more challenging for women, (3) the role of mentoring in this area, (4) the impact of institutional policies and practices intended to improve work-life balance, and (5) perceptions of stereotype and stigma associated with utilization of these programs.

CONCLUSIONS: In academic medicine, in contrast to other fields in which a lack of affordable childcare may be the principal challenge, barriers to work-life balance appear to be deeply rooted within professional culture. A combination of mentorship, interventions that target institutional and professional culture, and efforts to destigmatize reliance on flexibility (with regard to timing and location of work) are most likely to promote the satisfaction and success of the new generation of clinician-researchers who desire work-life balance.

References

  1. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Mar 10;168(5):544-8 - PubMed
  2. Acad Med. 2005 Jun;80(6):527-32 - PubMed
  3. Gend Med. 2010 Oct;7(5):438-50 - PubMed
  4. JAMA. 2000 Jul 26;284(4):478-82 - PubMed
  5. Acad Med. 2001 May;76(5):453-65 - PubMed
  6. Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):497-504 - PubMed
  7. Acad Med. 2004 Apr;79(4):319-25 - PubMed
  8. Arch Surg. 2002 Aug;137(8):941-5; discussion 945-7 - PubMed
  9. Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):759-67 - PubMed
  10. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Sep 21;141(6):471-4 - PubMed
  11. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Oct 1;129(7):532-8 - PubMed
  12. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 May 05;6:55 - PubMed
  13. Surgery. 2002 Aug;132(2):415-9 - PubMed
  14. Acad Med. 2005 Sep;80(9):791-6 - PubMed
  15. West J Med. 1991 Apr;154(4):423-6 - PubMed
  16. Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1415-21 - PubMed
  17. Biosci Trends. 2009 Dec;3(6):202-9 - PubMed
  18. Med Educ. 2001 Feb;35(2):139-47 - PubMed
  19. Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):985-93 - PubMed
  20. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Oct;20(10):1485-96 - PubMed
  21. BMC Med Educ. 2007 Oct 14;7:37 - PubMed
  22. Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):488-96 - PubMed
  23. Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):752-8 - PubMed
  24. JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1173-8 - PubMed
  25. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 20;355(3):281-7 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 2000 Jul 19;284(3):357-62 - PubMed
  27. Acad Med. 2013 Apr;88(4):505-11 - PubMed
  28. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 30;321(22):1511-7 - PubMed
  29. Acad Med. 2005 Mar;80(3):205-10 - PubMed
  30. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 May;20(5):725-32 - PubMed
  31. Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Apr;80(4):66-73, 125 - PubMed
  32. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 1;151(11):804-11 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support