Display options
Share it on

Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Feb 24;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s13293-015-0021-2. eCollection 2015.

Extracellular vesicles in urine of women with but not without kidney stones manifest patterns similar to men: a case control study.

Biology of sex differences

Muthuvel Jayachandran, Ghiara Lugo, Hillary Heiling, Virginia M Miller, Andrew D Rule, John C Lieske

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA ; Department of Physiology & Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
  2. Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.
  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA ; Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.

PMID: 25729563 PMCID: PMC4345020 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-015-0021-2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lifetime incidence of kidney stones is about two times greater in men compared to women. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) shed from activated cells are present in the urine and may reflect or even mediate renal physiology and/or pathology. This study was designed to standardize methodology to characterize urinary EVs by digital flow cytometry and to identify possible sex differences in EVs in persons with and without their first symptomatic kidney stones.

METHODS: Twenty-four-hour urine collections were obtained from persons presenting with their first kidney stone episode (n = 50 women, 60 men; age 19-76 years) and sex- and age-matched controls from the general population (n = 24 women, 36 men).

RESULTS: Standardization: Size of EV was variable within all groups. EV positivity was verified with two fluorophores for surface phosphatidylserine and/or using two different protein markers specific for renal-specific cells. The number of phosphatidylserine- and exosome marker-positive EVs did not correlate with urine osmolality and were similar in fresh vs. frozen and between two sequential urine collections from the same individual. Sex differences: Urine from women controls contained greater (P < 0.05) numbers of EVs positive for phosphatidylserine, exosomes, inflammatory factors and adhesion molecules, and cell-specific markers from different segments of the nephron, renal pelvis, and bladder compared to control men. In contrast, urine from women with kidney stones contained significantly (P < 0.05) lower numbers of EVs derived from podocytes, parietal cells, proximal convoluted tubule, thin and thick loop of Henle, distal tubule, collecting duct, renal pelvis, and bladder compared to control women and contained similar quantities of these types of EVs in men with and without kidney stones. There were also no sex differences in EVs positive for cell adhesion (E-cadherin and inter-cellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1]) molecules.

CONCLUSIONS: Unlike women who do not have kidney stones, EVs in urine from women with nephrolithiasis are similar to men with and without kidney stones. Thus, EVs may mediate or reflect aspects of kidney stone pathogenesis and perhaps provide clues regarding sex differences in kidney stone incidence rates.

Keywords: Exosomes; Flow cytometry; Microparticles; Microvesicles; Sex differences; Urinary vesicles; Vesicles

References

  1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000 Feb;11(2):319-29 - PubMed
  2. Kidney Int. 1994 Sep;46(3):893-9 - PubMed
  3. J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):1923-7 - PubMed
  4. Am J Physiol. 1996 Jan;270(1 Pt 2):F192-9 - PubMed
  5. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jun;97(6):1847-60 - PubMed
  6. Rev Urol. 2010 Spring;12(2-3):e86-96 - PubMed
  7. Kidney Int. 2003 May;63(5):1817-23 - PubMed
  8. Int J Urol. 2008 Feb;15(2):115-20 - PubMed
  9. Platelets. 2007 Nov;18(7):515-21 - PubMed
  10. Climacteric. 2009 Apr;12(2):177-84 - PubMed
  11. Kidney Int. 2011 Dec;80(11):1138-45 - PubMed
  12. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Sep;295(3):H931-H938 - PubMed
  13. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2010 Jan;19(1):7-12 - PubMed
  14. J Urol. 2012 Mar;187(3):1094-100 - PubMed
  15. Gend Med. 2008 Mar;5(1):10-23 - PubMed
  16. Pflugers Arch. 2007 Dec;455(3):397-429 - PubMed
  17. Br J Haematol. 2004 Jun;125(6):804-13 - PubMed
  18. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 02;9(9):e109074 - PubMed
  19. J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):158-64 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Invest. 2005 Oct;115(10 ):2598-608 - PubMed
  21. J Immunol Methods. 2012 Jan 31;375(1-2):207-14 - PubMed
  22. Am J Physiol. 1997 Jan;272(1 Pt 2):F55-62 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support