Display options
Share it on

Health Educ Res. 2015 Dec;30(6):840-8. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv044. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

State legislators' sources and use of information: bridging the gap between research and policy.

Health education research

Elizabeth A Dodson, Nora A Geary, Ross C Brownson

Affiliations

  1. Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA, [email protected].
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA and.
  3. Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA, Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

PMID: 26464418 PMCID: PMC4769321 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv044

Abstract

Research can inform policymakers of public health issues and shape policy decisions, hopefully benefiting public health; thus, improving dissemination of research to policymakers is important for developing effective public health policies that improve health and health equity. However, the utilization of research among policymakers is often not fully realized. This study builds upon current knowledge about what types of information legislators seek when working on health issues and where they go for information. Further, it explores what kinds of information legislators find most helpful and if there are ways researchers could better provide this evidence. Key-informant interviews were conducted with 25 U.S. state legislators holding health committee leadership positions between July and November, 2010. Regarding types of information sought, most legislators discussed their desire for data and statistics when working on health-related issues. When asked about their most trusted sources of information, participants mentioned government sources as well as advocacy, lobby and industry groups. A few mentioned universities and healthcare professionals. Results from this study offer public health researchers and practitioners' insights into the types of information that may be most helpful to policymakers. Insights gathered may improve the dissemination of research and bridge the gap between knowledge users and knowledge producers.

© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].

References

  1. Milbank Q. 2008 Jun;86(2):177-208 - PubMed
  2. Fam Relat. 2009 Mar 26;58(2):229-243 - PubMed
  3. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Mar;7 Suppl 1:S99-107 - PubMed
  4. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Aug;27(2):183-4 - PubMed
  5. Health Res Policy Syst. 2003 Jan 13;1(1):2 - PubMed
  6. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2):164-72 - PubMed
  7. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):264-73 - PubMed
  8. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009 Aug 24;6:21 - PubMed
  9. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E56 - PubMed
  10. Milbank Q. 2003;81(2):221-48, 171-2 - PubMed
  11. Public Health Rep. 2008;123 Suppl 2:65-70 - PubMed
  12. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jun;54(6):461-8 - PubMed
  13. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):37-45 - PubMed
  14. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3 Suppl 2):S143-8 - PubMed
  15. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175-201 - PubMed
  16. Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36 - PubMed
  17. Health Policy. 2005 Jan;71(1):117-25 - PubMed
  18. Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1207-11 - PubMed
  19. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):632-7 - PubMed
  20. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Feb 16;103(4):306-16 - PubMed
  21. Health Promot Pract. 2012 Sep;13(5):581-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support