Display options
Share it on

BMC Med Educ. 2015 Dec 18;15:223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0513-0.

Factors associated with nursing students' medication competence at the beginning and end of their education.

BMC medical education

Virpi Sulosaari, Risto Huupponen, Maija Hupli, Pauli Puukka, Kirsti Torniainen, Helena Leino-Kilpi

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. [email protected].
  2. Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Drug Development and Therapeutics, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. [email protected].
  3. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. [email protected].
  4. National Institute for Health and Welfare, PL 57, FI-20521, Turku, Finland. [email protected].
  5. Hospital Pharmacy Hospital Pharmacy, Turku University Hospital, PO Box 52, FI-20521, Turku, Finland. [email protected].
  6. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. [email protected].

PMID: 26683623 PMCID: PMC4683869 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0513-0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In previous studies, deficiencies in nursing students' medication competence have been highlighted. However, the focus of research has been limited especially to medication calculation competence and factors associated with it. In order to develop undergraduate nursing education and research, an understanding of the individual and learning environmental factors associated with medication competence from a broader approach is warranted. Our aim was therefore to evaluate the theoretical, practical and decision-making competence of nursing students and to identify factors associated with their medication competence at the beginning and end of their education.

METHODS: We used a descriptive, correlational study design with a structured instrument including a set of potential associated factors, knowledge test, medication calculation test and patient vignettes. The participants were nursing students at the beginning (n = 328) and at the end of their education (n = 338). Data were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS: In the evaluation of theoretical medication competence, the students' mean score over the semesters was 72 % correct answers in a knowledge test. In the evaluation of practical medication competence, the mean score was 74 % correct answers in a medication calculation test. In the evaluation of decision-making competence, the mean score was 57 % correct answers on deciding the best action in the situation given in patient vignettes. At the end of their education, students were able to solve patient vignettes significantly better. Individual factors were most evidently associated with medication competence. At the beginning of their education, students' previous academic success had a stronger association with medication competence. However, at the end of the education students' abilities in self-regulated learning and study motivation were more significant factors.

CONCLUSION: The core elements of medication competence are significantly interrelated, highlighting the need to provide integrated and comprehensive medication education throughout the undergraduate education. Students' learning style is associated with medication competence. There is a need for methods to identify and support students having difficulties to self-regulate their learning. To increase the safety of medication care of patients, research focusing on the development of effective teaching methods is needed. This study produced information for future nursing education research in this field, especially for interventional studies.

References

  1. Collegian. 2014;21(4):327-35 - PubMed
  2. J Nurs Educ. 2014 Feb;53(2):108-11 - PubMed
  3. J Nurs Adm. 2008 Jan;38(1):19-26 - PubMed
  4. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6(1):15-24 - PubMed
  5. Nurs Stand. 2006 Mar 22-28;20(28):41-5 - PubMed
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Jul;31(5):499-505 - PubMed
  7. J Nurs Adm. 2009 May;39(5):204-10 - PubMed
  8. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Aug;18(3):451-62 - PubMed
  9. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Oct;30(7):697-701 - PubMed
  10. Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Feb;26(2):151-61 - PubMed
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):405-12 - PubMed
  12. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Aug;14(4):350-6 - PubMed
  13. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jun;33(6):602-7 - PubMed
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:580 - PubMed
  15. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 Jul;12(4):198-203 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):464-78 - PubMed
  17. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;6(4):389-95 - PubMed
  18. Contemp Nurse. 2008 Aug;30(1):12-9 - PubMed
  19. Nurse Educ Today. 2011 May;31(4):383-9 - PubMed
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:108 - PubMed
  21. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:49 - PubMed
  22. J Adv Nurs. 2010 Apr;66(4):891-9 - PubMed
  23. Res Nurs Health. 2012 Apr;35(2):178-86 - PubMed
  24. Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Nov;31(8):815-8 - PubMed
  25. J Prof Nurs. 2010 Sep-Oct;26(5):301-8 - PubMed
  26. Nurse Educ Today. 2007 May;27(4):341-7 - PubMed
  27. Nurse Educ Pract. 2006 Jul;6(4):192-8 - PubMed
  28. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:21 - PubMed
  29. West J Nurs Res. 1990 Aug;12(4):537-45 - PubMed
  30. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14(6):685-94 - PubMed
  31. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Sep;33(9):1014-9 - PubMed
  32. Nurse Educ Today. 1998 Jan;18(1):25-31 - PubMed
  33. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002 Sep;39(7):757-69 - PubMed
  34. Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Feb;29(2):217-23 - PubMed
  35. Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Jan;30(1):85-97 - PubMed
  36. Nurse Educ Today. 2012 May;32(4):399-405 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types