Display options
Share it on

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):147-164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.

Science and engineering ethics

Meghnaa Tallapragada, Gina M Eosco, Katherine A McComas

Affiliations

  1. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. [email protected].
  2. Eastern Research Group, Arlington, VA, 22201, USA.
  3. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

PMID: 26979178 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3

Abstract

This study investigates the level of awareness about funding influences and potential conflicts of interests (COI) among early career researchers. The sample for this study included users of one or more of the 14 U.S. laboratories associated with the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. To be eligible, respondents must have been either still completing graduate work or <5 years since graduation. In total, 713 early career researchers completed the web survey, with about half still in graduate school. Results indicate that although respondents were aware of potential funding and COI influences on their work, they remained largely ignorant of their role in addressing or managing these issues. Respondents often attributed the responsibility of addressing these issues to their supervisors. Respondents who had received some training around these issues, however, were more likely to assume more personal responsibility. Overall, this study points out that ignorance among early career researchers is less about awareness of funding and COI issues and more about taking personal responsibility for addressing these issues.

Keywords: Attribution of responsibility; Conflict of interest; Early career researchers; Ethical issues; Funding influences; Training

References

  1. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Oct;9(4):569-77; discussion 578-82 - PubMed
  2. JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2237-8 - PubMed
  3. Vet Dermatol. 2013 Feb;24(1):3-9.e1-2 - PubMed
  4. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):147-57 - PubMed
  5. PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e5 - PubMed
  6. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008 Nov;67(4):428-36 - PubMed
  7. JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):252-5 - PubMed
  8. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):857-74 - PubMed
  9. Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S39-48 - PubMed
  10. Account Res. 2004 Apr-Jun;11(2):83-102 - PubMed
  11. JAMA. 1993 Jun 2;269(21):2782-4 - PubMed
  12. Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Oct;8(4):483-4 - PubMed
  13. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):843-55 - PubMed
  14. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Oct;11(4):535-51 - PubMed
  15. Acad Med. 2001 Feb;76(2):209-14 - PubMed
  16. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):664-9 - PubMed
  17. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 - PubMed
  18. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):425-45 - PubMed
  19. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):699-717 - PubMed
  20. Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Oct;11(4):515-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types