Display options
Share it on

BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 19;16:285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1531-2.

What is the effectiveness of the support worker role for people with dementia and their carers? A systematic review.

BMC health services research

Dianne Goeman, Emma Renehan, Susan Koch

Affiliations

  1. RDNS Institute, Royal District Nursing Service Ltd, 31 Alma Rd, St Kilda, VIC, 3182, Australia. [email protected].
  2. RDNS Institute, Royal District Nursing Service Ltd, 31 Alma Rd, St Kilda, VIC, 3182, Australia.

PMID: 27435089 PMCID: PMC4950786 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1531-2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dementia is progressive in nature and the associated functional decline inevitably leads to increasing dependence on others in areas of daily living. Models of support have been developed and implemented to assist with adjusting to living with memory loss and functional decline; to navigate the health and aged care system; and to access services. We undertook a systematic review of international literature on key worker type support roles to identify essential components and ascertain how the role can be best utilised to assist community-dwelling people with dementia and their carers. This review of support roles is the first to our knowledge to include both quantitative and qualitative studies and all models of support.

METHOD: A systematic review of studies written in English and published between January 2003 and December 2014. Data sources were Medline, PsychInfo and CINAHL, internet, expert consultation and reference lists of included studies. After screening articles to ensure that they reported on a key worker type support role, involved carers and or people with dementia living at home and removing duplicates, eligible papers were appraised and evaluated.

RESULTS: Thirty six studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. Eligible studies were divided into type of support roles and study type. The heterogeneity of included studies and high risk of bias made a meta-analysis inappropriate and it was therefore difficult to draw overall conclusions. However, essential components shared across support worker models that demonstrated a positive impact on carer burden and improved quality of life included: long term intervention, face to face contact, individualised education and support based on needs, multi-disciplinary teams, collaborative input, health/clinical background of support workers, ongoing follow up and inter professional and inter-sectoral collaborations. There was a lack of studies assessing cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS: Studies that include a high quality evaluation of holistic, tailored models of support that identify which components of support produce the most valuable outcomes to assist people with dementia and their carers and families to continue to live meaningful lives are needed. There is also a need for a cost effectiveness evaluation of support worker roles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews: PROSPERO 2014 CRD42014013992 .

Keywords: Carers; Community dwelling people with dementia; Support workers

References

  1. Dementia (London). 2015 Jul;14(4):436-49 - PubMed
  2. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2009 Jun-Jul;24(3):193-207 - PubMed
  3. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Jan;58(1):S58-67 - PubMed
  4. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;27(12):1305-14 - PubMed
  5. Aging Ment Health. 2009 Mar;13(2):162-70 - PubMed
  6. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):65-72 - PubMed
  7. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Jun;12(3):359-64 - PubMed
  8. Aging Ment Health. 2011 Jan;15(1):5-12 - PubMed
  9. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 May;17(4):312-8 - PubMed
  10. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Oct;14(8):669-76 - PubMed
  11. Alzheimers Dement. 2012 Sep;8(5):426-36 - PubMed
  12. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1592-9 - PubMed
  13. Gerontologist. 2003 Aug;43(4):521-31 - PubMed
  14. Gerontologist. 2003 Aug;43(4):547-55 - PubMed
  15. Aging Ment Health. 2010 Jan;14(1):44-56 - PubMed
  16. Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Apr;59(4):433-6 - PubMed
  17. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 May;161(5):850-6 - PubMed
  18. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Apr;67(4):774-87 - PubMed
  19. Health Soc Care Community. 2009 Sep;17(5):485-94 - PubMed
  20. Am J Manag Care. 2012 Feb;18(2):85-94 - PubMed
  21. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004 Apr-Jun;18(2):75-82 - PubMed
  22. Dementia (London). 2013 Sep;12(5):588-605 - PubMed
  23. Gerontologist. 2003 Feb;43(1):73-85 - PubMed
  24. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2200-8 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2011 Sep 19;343:d5202 - PubMed
  26. BMC Geriatr. 2010 Aug 09;10:54 - PubMed
  27. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(1):110-8 - PubMed
  28. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jun 11;9:915-28 - PubMed
  29. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2011 Dec;26(4):365-77 - PubMed
  30. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Nov 21;145(10):713-26 - PubMed
  31. BMJ. 1997 Sep 20;315(7110):740-3 - PubMed
  32. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Mar;56(3):421-8 - PubMed
  33. Aging Ment Health. 2004 Jan;8(1):40-51 - PubMed
  34. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;18(4):298-307 - PubMed
  35. J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jul;14 (6):695-703 - PubMed
  36. Gerontologist. 2010 Oct;50(5):623-31 - PubMed
  37. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:6-20 - PubMed
  38. Inj Prev. 2005 Jun;11(3):148-51 - PubMed
  39. J Adv Nurs. 1996 May;23(5):948-53 - PubMed
  40. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;28(9):889-902 - PubMed
  41. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;17 (9):734-43 - PubMed
  42. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;25(4):395-402 - PubMed
  43. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Aug;15(8):521-8 - PubMed
  44. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Aug;48(8):933-43 - PubMed
  45. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e735-41 - PubMed
  46. Gerontologist. 2003 Aug;43(4):556-67 - PubMed
  47. JAMA. 2003 Oct 15;290(15):2015-22 - PubMed
  48. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 09;11:93 - PubMed
  49. Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jan;22(1):1-12 - PubMed
  50. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 14;12:395 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types