Display options
Share it on

J Prof Nurs. 2017 Sep - Oct;33(5):363-369. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

Partnership for development: A peer mentorship model for PhD students.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing

Allison A Lewinski, Tara Mann, Dalmacio Flores, Ashlee Vance, Janet Prvu Bettger, Rachel Hirschey

Affiliations

  1. Duke University School of Nursing, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Room 3080, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].
  2. Duke University School of Nursing, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Room 3080, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].
  3. Duke University School of Nursing, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Room 3080, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].
  4. Duke University School of Nursing, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Room 3080, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].
  5. Duke University School of Nursing, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Room 3080, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].
  6. Duke University School of Nursing, DUMC 3322, 307 Trent Drive, Room 3080, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 28931484 PMCID: PMC5630117 DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.03.004

Abstract

Formal mentoring relationships socialize Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) students to their current and future roles as nursing scholars. Despite formal mentoring, some students may desire or benefit from additional mentoring in an informal setting. Informal mentoring complements the one-to-one relationship students develop with a primary faculty mentor or dissertation chair. This manuscript describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a student-driven, peer mentorship model, titled Partnership for Development. This small group, peer mentorship model was implemented in a PhD program at a School of Nursing during an academic year. Five student peer facilitators organized a total of 32 PhD students, 2 post-doctoral associates, and invited 5 faculty to participate. Data includes pre- and post-implementation surveys completed by the students and peer facilitator field notes. Student reported post-participation benefits included: getting to know faculty in an informal setting (n=6), socializing with students from other cohorts (n=6), and obtaining a sense of camaraderie with other PhD students (n=5). We recommend peer mentorship for other PhD programs as a way to socialize PhD students into the role of nurse scientist and assist students during their tenure as a PhD student.

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Mentorship; Nursing doctor of philosophy; Nursing graduate education; Nursing students; Peer group; Social support; Socialization

References

  1. J Prof Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;25(3):145-50 - PubMed
  2. Acad Med. 1989 May;64(5):231-5 - PubMed
  3. J Prof Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):163-72 - PubMed
  4. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2013 Jul;44(7):309-12 - PubMed
  5. Br J Nurs. 2008 May 22-Jun 11;17 (10 ):668-71 - PubMed
  6. Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1172-3 - PubMed
  7. J Prof Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):193-201 - PubMed
  8. Med Teach. 2010;32(10):e429-35 - PubMed
  9. J Prof Nurs. 2017 Jan - Feb;33(1):74-80 - PubMed
  10. Acad Med. 2007 Jul;82(7):718-22 - PubMed
  11. J Nurs Educ. 2014 Oct;53(10):595-9 - PubMed
  12. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;38(2):76-82 - PubMed
  13. Nurs Forum. 2011 Apr-Jun;46(2):64-70 - PubMed
  14. Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):523-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support