Display options
Share it on

Foods. 2018 Apr 12;7(4). doi: 10.3390/foods7040059.

Phytochemical Properties and Nutrigenomic Implications of Yacon as a Potential Source of Prebiotic: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)

Yang Cao, Zheng Feei Ma, Hongxia Zhang, Yifan Jin, Yihe Zhang, Frank Hayford

Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Promotion, Pudong Maternal and Child Health Care Institution, Shanghai 201399, China. [email protected].
  2. Department of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China. [email protected].
  3. School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 15200, Kelantan, Malaysia. [email protected].
  4. Department of Food Science, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand. [email protected].
  5. Department of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China. [email protected].
  6. Division of Medicine, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London WC1E6BT, UK. [email protected].
  7. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 25, Ghana. [email protected].

PMID: 29649123 PMCID: PMC5920424 DOI: 10.3390/foods7040059

Abstract

The human gut is densely populated with diverse microbial communities that are essential to health. Prebiotics and fiber have been shown to possess the ability to modulate the gut microbiota. One of the plants being considered as a potential source of prebiotic is yacon. Yacon is an underutilized plant consumed as a traditional root-based fruit in South America. Yacon mainly contains fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and inulin. Therefore, it has bifidogenic benefits for gut health, because FOS are not easily broken down by digestive enzymes. Bioactive chemical compounds and extracts isolated from yacon have been studied for their various nutrigenomic properties, including as a prebiotic for intestinal health and their antimicrobial and antioxidant effects. This article reviewed scientific studies regarding the bioactive chemical compounds and nutrigenomic properties of extracts and isolated compounds from yacon. These findings may help in further research to investigate yacon-based nutritional products. Yacon can be considered a potential prebiotic source and a novel functional food. However, more detailed epidemiological, animal, and human clinical studies, particularly mechanism-based and phytopharmacological studies, are lacking for the development of evidence-based functional food products.

Keywords: Smallanthus sonchifolius; fructooligosaccharides; prebiotic; underutilized; yacon

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Autophagy. 2011 Feb;7(2):235-7 - PubMed
  2. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2013 Sep;68(3):222-8 - PubMed
  3. Chem Biol Interact. 2011 Oct 15;194(1):31-9 - PubMed
  4. Pharm Biol. 2015 Aug;53(8):1183-93 - PubMed
  5. Clin Nutr. 2009 Apr;28(2):182-7 - PubMed
  6. Br J Nutr. 2002 May;87 Suppl 2:S187-91 - PubMed
  7. J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Jul 13;53(14 ):5577-82 - PubMed
  8. Antioxidants (Basel). 2017 Sep 15;6(3):null - PubMed
  9. J Agric Food Chem. 1999 Nov;47(11):4711-3 - PubMed
  10. Molecules. 2018 Jan 29;23 (2):null - PubMed
  11. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2014;78(9):1592-602 - PubMed
  12. Nutr Diabetes. 2013 May 27;3:e70 - PubMed
  13. Food Chem. 2012 Dec 1;135(3):1592-9 - PubMed
  14. Digestion. 2008;78(1):30-3 - PubMed
  15. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001 Feb;74(2):125-32 - PubMed
  16. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Jun;66(6):2682-4 - PubMed
  17. Br J Nutr. 2007 Feb;97(2):365-72 - PubMed
  18. J Nutr. 1999 Jul;129(7 Suppl):1402S-6S - PubMed
  19. J Med Food. 2012 Jul;15(7):664-70 - PubMed
  20. J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Aug 27;51(18):5278-84 - PubMed
  21. Food Chem Toxicol. 2005 Nov;43(11):1657-65 - PubMed
  22. Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Jul 31;16(8):17696-718 - PubMed
  23. J Chromatogr A. 2003 Oct 17;1016(1):89-98 - PubMed
  24. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Mar;69(3):544-8 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Nutr. 2014 Oct;53(7):1457-64 - PubMed
  26. Br J Nutr. 2010 Aug;104 Suppl 2:S1-63 - PubMed
  27. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;98(4):857-64 - PubMed
  28. Food Chem. 2015 Dec 1;188:504-9 - PubMed
  29. Nutrition. 2014 Jun;30(6):666-72 - PubMed
  30. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2009 Jun;64(2):102-7 - PubMed
  31. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep;42 Suppl 3 Pt 2:S156-9 - PubMed
  32. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Mar;67(3):445-51 - PubMed
  33. J Med Food. 2015 Sep;18(9):980-6 - PubMed
  34. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Aug;50(8):2902-10 - PubMed
  35. J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Mar 21;55(6):2424-30 - PubMed
  36. Br J Nutr. 2007 Apr;97(4):776-85 - PubMed
  37. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2010 Apr;2(2):149-52 - PubMed
  38. Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):729-37 - PubMed
  39. Gastroenterology. 2010 Jun;138(6):2044-58 - PubMed
  40. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2003 Dec;147(2):119-30 - PubMed
  41. J Nutr. 2002 Dec;132(12):3599-602 - PubMed
  42. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Nov 21;144(2):362-70 - PubMed
  43. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2004 Mar;20(2):109-20 - PubMed
  44. Br J Nutr. 2005 Apr;93 Suppl 1:S163-8 - PubMed
  45. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996 Jun;63(6):939-45 - PubMed
  46. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;40(3):235-43 - PubMed
  47. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(1):32-40 - PubMed
  48. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Jan 27;133(2):434-41 - PubMed
  49. J Investig Med. 2017 Feb;65(2):311-315 - PubMed
  50. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30 - PubMed
  51. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2003 Oct;67(10):2154-9 - PubMed
  52. DNA Res. 2014 Oct;21(5):469-80 - PubMed
  53. Nutrients. 2018 Jan 24;10 (2):null - PubMed
  54. Clin Chem. 1998 Sep;44(9):1931-6 - PubMed
  55. J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Jan 29;51(3):793-6 - PubMed

Publication Types