Display options
Share it on

Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 01;35(22):4724-4729. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz285.

Multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)

Wujuan Zhong, Cassandra N Spracklen, Karen L Mohlke, Xiaojing Zheng, Jason Fine, Yun Li

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  2. Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  3. Department of Pediatrics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  4. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  5. Department of Computer Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

PMID: 31099385 PMCID: PMC6853702 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz285

Abstract

SUMMARY: Tens of thousands of reproducibly identified GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Studies) variants, with the vast majority falling in non-coding regions resulting in no eventual protein products, call urgently for mechanistic interpretations. Although numerous methods exist, there are few, if any methods, for simultaneously testing the mediation effects of multiple correlated SNPs via some mediator (e.g. the expression of a gene in the neighborhood) on phenotypic outcome. We propose multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test (SMUT) to fill in this methodological gap. Our extensive simulations demonstrate the validity of SMUT as well as substantial, up to 92%, power gains over alternative methods. In addition, SMUT confirmed known mediators in a real dataset of Finns for plasma adiponectin level, which were missed by many alternative methods. We believe SMUT will become a useful tool to generate mechanistic hypotheses underlying GWAS variants, facilitating functional follow-up.

AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package SMUT is publicly available from CRAN at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SMUT.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

References

  1. PLoS Genet. 2016 Aug 17;12(8):e1006011 - PubMed
  2. Nat Genet. 2016 May;48(5):481-7 - PubMed
  3. Nat Genet. 2016 Mar;48(3):245-52 - PubMed
  4. Genet Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;41(8):824-833 - PubMed
  5. Genome Res. 2017 Nov;27(11):1859-1871 - PubMed
  6. Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):1-22 - PubMed
  7. Genet Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;41(7):577-586 - PubMed
  8. BMC Genet. 2009 May 27;10:23 - PubMed
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 - PubMed
  10. Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Jul;14(7):483-95 - PubMed
  11. Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:17-32 - PubMed
  12. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593-614 - PubMed
  13. Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;44(2):512-25 - PubMed
  14. Bioinformatics. 2016 Mar 1;32(5):650-6 - PubMed
  15. Genet Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;42(5):418-433 - PubMed
  16. Stat Med. 2008 Apr 15;27(8):1133-63 - PubMed
  17. Cell Rep. 2016 Nov 15;17(8):2042-2059 - PubMed
  18. Genome Res. 2005 Nov;15(11):1576-83 - PubMed
  19. Stat Med. 2015 Jan 15;34(1):162-78 - PubMed
  20. Bioinformatics. 2017 Dec 1;33(23):3793-3795 - PubMed
  21. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jul 3;95(1):5-23 - PubMed
  22. Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Jan;15(1):34-48 - PubMed
  23. Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1091-8 - PubMed
  24. Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Jul 15;89(1):82-93 - PubMed
  25. Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Feb 2;100(2):228-237 - PubMed
  26. Diabetes. 2009 May;58(5):1212-21 - PubMed
  27. Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jun 11;86(6):929-42 - PubMed
  28. Science. 2015 May 8;348(6235):648-60 - PubMed
  29. Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Mar 2;100(3):428-443 - PubMed
  30. Ann Appl Stat. 2014 Mar 1;8(1):352-376 - PubMed
  31. Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Jun 6;92(6):841-53 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support