Display options
Share it on

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Apr 05;14:705-715. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S233830. eCollection 2020.

Assessing Preferences for Rare Disease Treatment: Qualitative Development of the Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Patient Preference Questionnaire (PNH-PPQ.

Patient preference and adherence

Karen Kaiser, Susan E Yount, Christa E Martens, Kimberly A Webster, Sara Shaunfield, Amy Sparling, John Devin Peipert, David Cella, Scott T Rottinghaus, Bonnie M K Donato, Richard Wells, Ioannis Tomazos

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
  3. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 32308375 PMCID: PMC7147619 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S233830

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a patient preference questionnaire (PPQ) assessing eculizumab and ravulizumab treatment for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The development of the PNH-PPQ

RESULTS: Six themes were identified as most relevant to the PNH treatment experience from the concept elicitation interviews: disease symptoms (n=8/8); treatment frequency (n=7/8); quality of life impact of treatment/disease (n=7/8); treatment burden (n=7/8); treatment efficacy (n=5/8); and treatment side effects (n=5/8). An initial list of 88 preference questions was reduced to 11 highly relevant and non-redundant questions reflecting the 6 themes. Cognitive interview participants unanimously agreed that the PNH-PPQ instructions were clear; response options were understandable, easy to use, and provided enough choices; and the questions captured the factors that inform treatment preferences.

DISCUSSION: When new drugs have similar efficacy to existing medications, documenting patient preferences is important for confirming patient benefit from the new medication. Understanding what matters most to patients is essential for delivering patient-centered care and may play a particularly significant role in treatment decision making. The availability of such a tool may be especially important as new orphan drugs are developed and patients with rare diseases have more than one treatment option to consider.

CONCLUSION: The PNH-PPQ provides a patient-centered approach for evaluating preferences for the treatment of PNH. The PNH-PPQ has subsequently assessed patient preference in the clinical trial sub-study ALXN1210-PNH-302s.

© 2020 Kaiser et al.

Keywords: eculizumab; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; questionnaire development; ravulizumab; treatment experience

Conflict of interest statement

David Cella is a consultant to, and has received grant support from, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Scott T. Rottinghaus is an employee of, and owns stock in, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. Bonnie M. K.

References

  1. Leuk Res Rep. 2015 May 16;4(1):36-8 - PubMed
  2. Nihon Rinsho. 2013 Dec;71(12):2223-31 - PubMed
  3. Blood. 2011 Jun 23;117(25):6786-92 - PubMed
  4. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 26;2:12 - PubMed
  5. Br J Haematol. 2004 Jul;126(1):133-8 - PubMed
  6. Blood. 2014 Oct 30;124(18):2804-11 - PubMed
  7. Patient. 2014;7(3):235-41 - PubMed
  8. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79 - PubMed
  9. Support Care Cancer. 2004 Jun;12(6):463-6 - PubMed
  10. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):9-18 - PubMed
  11. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jul 11;4:42 - PubMed
  12. Mol Immunol. 1996 Dec;33(17-18):1389-401 - PubMed
  13. Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):815-24 - PubMed
  14. Br J Haematol. 2002 Apr;117(1):3-22 - PubMed
  15. MedGenMed. 2001 Mar 05;3(2):2 - PubMed
  16. F1000Res. 2016 Feb 23;5: - PubMed
  17. Bone. 2006 Apr;38(4 Suppl 1):S2-6 - PubMed
  18. Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):913-26 - PubMed
  19. Med Care Rev. 1993 Summer;50(2):219-48 - PubMed
  20. Value Health. 2004 Mar-Apr;7(2):204-15 - PubMed
  21. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Feb;42(3):389-98 - PubMed
  22. Blood. 2019 Feb 7;133(6):530-539 - PubMed
  23. Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1109-16 - PubMed
  24. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Dec;31(12):2261-72 - PubMed
  25. Medicine (Baltimore). 2004 May;83(3):193-207 - PubMed
  26. Cancer Med. 2015 May;4(5):690-8 - PubMed
  27. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 21;355(12):1233-43 - PubMed
  28. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Aug;34(6):506-17 - PubMed
  29. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Feb;132(2):197-207 - PubMed
  30. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Mar;9(3):268-78 - PubMed
  31. Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):629-642 - PubMed
  32. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016 Mar;34(2):201-8 - PubMed
  33. Am J Hematol. 2016 Jun;91(4):366-70 - PubMed
  34. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013 May;14(3):245-53 - PubMed
  35. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 9;333(19):1253-8 - PubMed
  36. Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):573-7 - PubMed
  37. Consult Pharm. 2010 Oct;25(10):671-5 - PubMed
  38. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Jul;23(7):2043-51 - PubMed
  39. Eur J Cancer. 2016 Mar;55:1-6 - PubMed
  40. Z Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;70(3):232-4, 236-8 - PubMed
  41. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Apr;12(2):167-80 - PubMed
  42. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Apr 15;148(8):587-95 - PubMed
  43. Blood. 2019 Feb 7;133(6):540-549 - PubMed
  44. Clin Ther. 2003 Aug;25(8):2307-35; discussion 2306 - PubMed
  45. Oncologist. 2008 Sep;13(9):993-1000 - PubMed

Publication Types