Display options
Share it on

Acad Med. 2021 Sep 01;96(9):1247-1249. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004217.

Discontinuation of the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills Examination: Studying the Past to Define the Future.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges

Lisa D Howley, Deborah L Engle

Affiliations

  1. L.D. Howley is senior director of strategic initiatives and partnership, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, and adjunct associate professor, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  2. D.L. Engle is assistant dean of assessment and evaluation and associate professor, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

PMID: 34166236 DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004217

Abstract

The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 2 Clinical Skills (CS) was discontinued in January 2021, marking a significant milestone in assessment of clinical skills. In this commentary, the authors trace the history of the Step 2 CS exam-beginning with its early roots in the 1960s up to its discontinuation in 2021. In this new era, the medical education community is replete with opportunities for advancing methodology and content associated with clinical skills assessment. The authors propose 3 main lessons gleaned from this rich history and modern evolution, which are aimed at defining a future that includes creative collaboration toward development of comprehensive, equitable, student-focused, and patient-centered clinical performance assessment. First, as it has done throughout history, the medical education community should continue to innovate, collaborate, and improve upon methods of clinical skills assessment. Second, medical educators should continue to shift to more complex and student-driven approaches of assessment, that is, assessments that provide an unstructured environment, are realistic with respect to the natural conditions, and do not limit students to lists of options or force them to take a certain path of reasoning. Third, medical educators should continue to rethink the role of assessment and ensure that all assessments, regardless of stakes or type, provide sufficient feedback for the student to identify areas of strength and weakness.

Copyright © 2021 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

References

  1. United States Medical Licensing Examination. Announcements: Work to relaunch USMLE Step 2 CS discontinued. https://www.usmle.org/announcements/. Published January 26, 2021 Accessed June 9, 2021. - PubMed
  2. United States Medical Licensing Examination. About USMLE. https://www.usmle.org/. Accessed April 28, 2021. - PubMed
  3. Wallace P. Following the threads of an innovation: The history of standardized patients in medical education. Caduceus. 1997;13:5–28. - PubMed
  4. Association of American Medical Colleges. Physicians for the Twenty-First Century. The GPEP Report: Report of the Panel on the General Professional Education of the Physician and College Preparation for Medicine. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED252102.pdf. Published 1984. Accessed April 29, 2021. - PubMed
  5. Doyle L. Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Practice and Reasoning Assessment [dissertation]. 1999.Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia; - PubMed
  6. United States Medical Licensing Examination. Step 2 CS Content Description and General Information. 2015.Federation of State Medical Boards and the National Board of Medical Examiners; - PubMed
  7. Howley LD. Performance assessment in medical education: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Eval Health Prof. 2004;27:285–303. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types