Display options
Share it on

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Dec 01;26:16080. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.80.

Singing for Lung Health-a systematic review of the literature and consensus statement.

NPJ primary care respiratory medicine

Adam Lewis, Phoene Cave, Myra Stern, Lindsay Welch, Karen Taylor, Juliet Russell, Anne-Marie Doyle, Anne-Marie Russell, Heather McKee, Stephen Clift, Julia Bott, Nicholas S Hopkinson

Affiliations

  1. NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
  2. Respiratory Medicine, Whittington Health, London, UK.
  3. Southampton Integrated COPD Service, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
  4. British Lung Foundation, London, UK.
  5. Sidney De Haan Research Centre for Arts and Health, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK.

PMID: 27906158 PMCID: PMC5131649 DOI: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.80

Abstract

There is growing interest in Singing for Lung Health (SLH), an approach where patients with respiratory disease take part in singing groups, intended to improve their condition. A consensus group was convened in early 2016 to address issues including: the specific features that make SLH distinct from other forms of participation in singing; the existing evidence base via a systematic review; gaps in the evidence base including the need to define value-based outcome measures for sustainable commissioning of SLH; defining the measures needed to evaluate both individuals' responses to SLH and the quality of singing programmes. and core training, expertise and competencies required by singing group leaders to deliver high-quality programmes. A systematic review to establish the extent of the evidence base for SLH was undertaken. Electronic databases, including Pubmed, OVID Medline and Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and PEDro, were used. Six studies were included in the final review. Quantitative data suggest that singing has the potential to improve health-related quality of life, particularly related to physical health, and levels of anxiety without causing significant side effects. There is a significant risk of bias in many of the existing studies with small numbers of subjects overall. Little comparison can be made between studies owing to their heterogeneity in design. Qualitative data indicate that singing is an enjoyable experience for patients, who consistently report that it helps them to cope with their condition better. Larger and longer-term trials are needed.

Conflict of interest statement

PC and JR have both been employed by leading singing groups for people with respiratory disease and so have a direct commercial interest in the promotion of singing as an intervention within the NHS.

References

  1. Thorax. 2009 May;64 Suppl 1:i1-51 - PubMed
  2. Palliat Med. 2004 Oct;18(7):619-25 - PubMed
  3. J R Soc Promot Health. 2001 Dec;121(4):248-56 - PubMed
  4. BMC Pulm Med. 2010 Aug 03;10:41 - PubMed
  5. Respiration. 2012;84(3):193-9 - PubMed
  6. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2014 Nov 03;1(1):e000042 - PubMed
  7. Respir Med. 2007 Mar;101(3):411-22 - PubMed
  8. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:1-8 - PubMed
  9. Health Promot J Austr. 2010 Apr;21(1):39-44 - PubMed
  10. Respiration. 2013;86(6):462-71 - PubMed
  11. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec 1;186(11):1192; author reply 1192-3 - PubMed
  12. Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1115-22 - PubMed
  13. Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Summer;46(3 Suppl):S39-52 - PubMed
  14. Chron Respir Dis. 2007;4(2):77-85 - PubMed
  15. BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Nov 13;12:69 - PubMed
  16. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 02;9(6):e98340 - PubMed
  17. J Rural Health. 2010 Winter;26(1):100-4 - PubMed
  18. Respir Med. 2013 Feb;107(2):242-8 - PubMed
  19. J Music Ther. 2005 Spring;42(1):20-48 - PubMed
  20. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;26(5):458-63 - PubMed
  21. Thorax. 2013 Sep;68 Suppl 2:ii1-30 - PubMed
  22. Thorax. 2014 Nov;69(11):973-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types