Display options
Share it on

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Mar 26;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-117.

Is Europe putting theory into practice? A qualitative study of the level of self-management support in chronic care management approaches.

BMC health services research

Arianne Elissen, Ellen Nolte, Cécile Knai, Matthias Brunn, Karine Chevreul, Annalijn Conklin, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Antje Erler, Maria Flamm, Anne Frølich, Birgit Fullerton, Ramune Jacobsen, Zuleika Saz-Parkinson, Antonio Sarria-Santamera, Andreas Sönnichsen, Hubertus Vrijhoef

Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Services Research, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands. [email protected]

PMID: 23530744 PMCID: PMC3621080 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-117

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-management support is a key component of effective chronic care management, yet in practice appears to be the least implemented and most challenging. This study explores whether and how self-management support is integrated into chronic care approaches in 13 European countries. In addition, it investigates the level of and barriers to implementation of support strategies in health care practice.

METHODS: We conducted a review among the 13 participating countries, based on a common data template informed by the Chronic Care Model. Key informants presented a sample of representative chronic care approaches and related self-management support strategies. The cross-country review was complemented by a Dutch case study of health professionals' views on the implementation of self-management support in practice.

RESULTS: Self-management support for chronically ill patients remains relatively underdeveloped in Europe. Similarities between countries exist mostly in involved providers (nurses) and settings (primary care). Differences prevail in mode and format of support, and materials used. Support activities focus primarily on patients' medical and behavioral management, and less on emotional management. According to Dutch providers, self-management support is not (yet) an integral part of daily practice; implementation is hampered by barriers related to, among others, funding, IT and medical culture.

CONCLUSIONS: Although collaborative care for chronic conditions is becoming more important in European health systems, adequate self-management support for patients with chronic disease is far from accomplished in most countries. There is a need for better understanding of how we can encourage both patients and health care providers to engage in productive interactions in daily chronic care practice, which can improve health and social outcomes.

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD003267 - PubMed
  2. Diabetologia. 2006 Feb;49(2):279-88 - PubMed
  3. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):335-42 - PubMed
  4. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Dec;48(5):484-92 - PubMed
  5. Eff Clin Pract. 1998 Aug-Sep;1(1):2-4 - PubMed
  6. Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):561-87 - PubMed
  7. JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9 - PubMed
  8. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1438-47 - PubMed
  9. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Apr-Jun;35(2):118-28 - PubMed
  10. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Dec;30(12):2437-48 - PubMed
  11. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jul;25(7):1159-71 - PubMed
  12. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):299-305 - PubMed
  13. Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1350 - PubMed
  14. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD000072 - PubMed
  15. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010 Jan;5(Pt 1):71-90 - PubMed
  16. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78 - PubMed
  17. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Oct 15;72(8):1503-10 - PubMed
  18. Diabetes Care. 2001 Oct;24(10):1821-33 - PubMed
  19. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010 Jan;12(1):12-9 - PubMed
  20. Hosp Q. 2003;7(1):73-82 - PubMed
  21. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Oct -Nov;48(2):177-87 - PubMed
  22. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):254-61 - PubMed
  23. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):526-35 - PubMed
  24. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jun;79(3):277-82 - PubMed
  25. JAMA. 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2469-75 - PubMed
  26. Ann Fam Med. 2005 May-Jun;3(3):209-14 - PubMed
  27. Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):791-820 - PubMed
  28. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Nov;29(11):563-74 - PubMed
  29. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13 Suppl 2:58-64 - PubMed
  30. Gerontologist. 2007 Oct;47(5):697-704 - PubMed
  31. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 15;127(12):1097-102 - PubMed
  32. BMJ. 2001 Oct 27;323(7319):983-5 - PubMed
  33. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Feb;31(2):426-33 - PubMed
  34. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):1014-23 - PubMed
  35. N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1 - PubMed
  36. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):w1-16 - PubMed
  37. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 May;57(2):153-7 - PubMed
  38. Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9 Suppl):S26-33 - PubMed
  39. Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):608-21 - PubMed
  40. JAMA. 1996 Nov 13;276(18):1473-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types