Display options
Share it on

Sci Data. 2016 Jun 21;3:160044. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44.

The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments.

Scientific data

Krzysztof J Gorgolewski, Tibor Auer, Vince D Calhoun, R Cameron Craddock, Samir Das, Eugene P Duff, Guillaume Flandin, Satrajit S Ghosh, Tristan Glatard, Yaroslav O Halchenko, Daniel A Handwerker, Michael Hanke, David Keator, Xiangrui Li, Zachary Michael, Camille Maumet, B Nolan Nichols, Thomas E Nichols, John Pellman, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Ariel Rokem, Gunnar Schaefer, Vanessa Sochat, William Triplett, Jessica A Turner, Gaël Varoquaux, Russell A Poldrack

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
  2. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
  3. The Mind Research Network, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA.
  4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA.
  5. Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962, USA.
  6. Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, New York 10022, USA.
  7. McGill Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Ludmer Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4.
  8. FMRIB Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
  9. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London WC1N 3BG, UK.
  10. McGovern Institute for Brain Research, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
  11. Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
  12. Université de Lyon, CREATIS; CNRS UMR5220; Inserm U1044; INSA-Lyon; Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne 69100, France.
  13. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.
  14. Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
  15. Department of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg 39016, Germany.
  16. Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg 39118, Germany.
  17. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, California, Irvine 92697, USA.
  18. Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
  19. Squishymedia, Portland, Oregon 97232, USA.
  20. WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
  21. Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
  22. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304, USA.
  23. Department of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
  24. Henry Wheeler Jr. Brain Imaging Center, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
  25. The University of Washington eScience Institute, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.
  26. Flywheel Exchange, LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405, USA.
  27. Program in Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
  28. Department of Psychology &the Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302, USA.
  29. Parietal team, INRIA Saclay, Palaiseau 91120, FR.

PMID: 27326542 PMCID: PMC4978148 DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.44

Abstract

The development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques has defined modern neuroimaging. Since its inception, tens of thousands of studies using techniques such as functional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging have allowed for the non-invasive study of the brain. Despite the fact that MRI is routinely used to obtain data for neuroscience research, there has been no widely adopted standard for organizing and describing the data collected in an imaging experiment. This renders sharing and reusing data (within or between labs) difficult if not impossible and unnecessarily complicates the application of automatic pipelines and quality assurance protocols. To solve this problem, we have developed the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), a standard for organizing and describing MRI datasets. The BIDS standard uses file formats compatible with existing software, unifies the majority of practices already common in the field, and captures the metadata necessary for most common data processing operations.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Neuroimage. 2009 Oct 1;47(4):1720-34 - PubMed
  2. Front Neuroinform. 2011 Aug 22;5:13 - PubMed
  3. Front Neuroinform. 2015 Jan 15;8:90 - PubMed
  4. Neuroinformatics. 2007 Spring;5(1):11-34 - PubMed
  5. Neuroimage. 2008 Aug 1;42(1):178-95 - PubMed
  6. Neuroinformatics. 2010 Dec;8(4):231-49 - PubMed
  7. Front Neurosci. 2013 Feb 06;7:9 - PubMed
  8. Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:647-61 - PubMed
  9. Neuroinformatics. 2006;4(2):199-212 - PubMed
  10. Front Neuroinform. 2011 Dec 23;5:33 - PubMed
  11. Front Neuroinform. 2013 Jul 08;7:12 - PubMed
  12. Neuropsychol Rev. 2015 Sep;25(3):356-68 - PubMed
  13. Front Neuroinform. 2012 May 24;6:12 - PubMed
  14. Front Neuroinform. 2011 Sep 06;5:17 - PubMed
  15. Neuroinformatics. 2013 Oct;11(4):495-505 - PubMed
  16. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008 Mar;12(2):162-72 - PubMed
  17. Neuroinformatics. 2012 Jan;10(1):57-66 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2012 Apr 04;484(7392):24-6 - PubMed
  19. Neuroinformatics. 2012 Jan;10(1):19-32 - PubMed
  20. Front Neuroinform. 2012 Jan 20;5:37 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support