Display options
Cite
Swendiman RA, Hoffman DI, Bruce AN, et al. Qualities and Methods of Highly Effective Surgical Educators: A Grounded Theory Model. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(5):1293-1302doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011.
Swendiman, R. A., Hoffman, D. I., Bruce, A. N., Blinman, T. A., Nance, M. L., & Chou, C. M. (2019). Qualities and Methods of Highly Effective Surgical Educators: A Grounded Theory Model. Journal of surgical education, 76(5), 1293-1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011
Swendiman, Robert A, et al. "Qualities and Methods of Highly Effective Surgical Educators: A Grounded Theory Model." Journal of surgical education vol. 76,5 (2019): 1293-1302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011
Swendiman RA, Hoffman DI, Bruce AN, Blinman TA, Nance ML, Chou CM. Qualities and Methods of Highly Effective Surgical Educators: A Grounded Theory Model. J Surg Educ. 2019 Sep - Oct;76(5):1293-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 15. PMID: 30879943.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Surg Educ. 2019 Sep - Oct;76(5):1293-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

Qualities and Methods of Highly Effective Surgical Educators: A Grounded Theory Model.

Journal of surgical education

Robert A Swendiman, Daniel I Hoffman, Adrienne N Bruce, Thane A Blinman, Michael L Nance, Carol M Chou

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: [email protected].
  2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  3. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  4. Division of General, Thoracic, and Fetal Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  5. Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

PMID: 30879943 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.011

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify personal qualities and teaching methods of highly effective surgical educators using a novel research design.

DESIGN: In this qualitative study, surgical residents were sent an electronic survey soliciting nominations for faculty perceived as highly effective surgical educators. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with surgeons receiving the most nominations. Grounded theory methodology identified themes for analysis.

SETTING: General, vascular, and plastic surgery residents and faculty at the University of Pennsylvania Health System.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 77 surgical residents were surveyed. Data saturation occurred after 12 semistructured interviews with attending surgeons, corresponding to the top 15% of faculty.

RESULTS: Interviewees described both personal characteristics and specific teaching approaches that facilitated successful learning. These included providing exceptional surgical education as a mission, a strong influence from past mentors and role models, a love for the profession, and a low rate of self-professed burnout. Desirable teaching methods included promoting a culture of psychological safety (the perceived ability to take interpersonal risks within one's environment), progressive autonomy, accountability of trainees, and individualized teaching for the learner. Interviewees saw education as inseparable from clinical duties, and all surgeons believed providing exceptional patient care was the foundation of effective surgical teaching. The derived themes suggested that educators prefer "cognitive-based" approaches, focusing on learning processes rather than specific outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: This study identified characteristics and educational styles of highly effective educators in a cohort of academic surgeons. This framework may inform the development of educational programs for residents and faculty in effective teaching methods.

Copyright © 2019 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Cognitive learning theory; Grounded theory; Interpersonal and Communication Skills; Mentorship; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; Psychological safety; Qualitative methods

MeSH terms

Publication Types