Display options
Share it on

BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 26;10(1):e031568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031568.

Content and outcomes of narrative medicine programmes: a systematic review of the literature through 2019.

BMJ open

Christy DiFrances Remein, Ellen Childs, John Carlo Pasco, Ludovic Trinquart, David B Flynn, Sarah L Wingerter, Robina M Bhasin, Lindsay B Demers, Emelia J Benjamin

Affiliations

  1. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  2. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA [email protected].
  3. Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

PMID: 31988222 PMCID: PMC7045204 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031568

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Narrative medicine (NM) incorporates stories into health sciences paradigms as fundamental aspects of the human experience. The aim of this systematic review is to answer the research question: how effective is the implementation and evaluation of NM programmes in academic medicine and health sciences? We documented objectives, content and evaluation outcomes of NM programming to provide recommendations for future narrative-based education.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature published through 2019 using five major databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and MedEdPORTAL. Eligible NM programming included textual analysis/close reading of published literature and creative/reflective writing. Qualifying participants comprised individuals from academic medicine and health sciences disciplines. We reviewed and categorised programme goals, content and evaluation activities to assess participant satisfaction and programme efficacy. Two members of the research team assessed the risk of bias, independently screening records via a two-round, iterative process to reach consensus on eligibility.

RESULTS: Of 1569 original citations identified, we selected 55 unique programmes (described in 61 records). In all, 41 (75%) programmes reported a form of evaluation; evaluation methods lacked consistency. Twenty-two programmes used quantitative evaluation (13 well described), and 33 programmes used qualitative evaluation (27 well described). Well-described quantitative evaluations relied on 32 different measures (7 validated) and showed evidence of high participant satisfaction and pre-post improvement in competencies such as relationship-building, empathy, confidence/personal accomplishment, pedagogical skills and clinical skills. An average of 88.3% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the programme had positive outcomes. Qualitative evaluation identified high participant satisfaction and improvement in competencies such as relationship-building, empathy, perspective-taking/reflection, resilience and burnout detection/mitigation, confidence/personal accomplishment, narrative competence, and ethical inquiry.

CONCLUSION: Evaluation suggests that NM programming leads to high participant satisfaction and positive outcomes across various competencies. We suggest best practices and innovative future directions for programme implementation and evaluation.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Keywords: education and training (see medical education & training); medical education and training; medical ethics

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. Fam Med. 2016 Apr;48(4):300-4 - PubMed
  2. Isis. 2015 Jun;106(2):341-52 - PubMed
  3. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 - PubMed
  4. Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):335-42 - PubMed
  5. Med Humanit. 2016 Dec;42(4):246-251 - PubMed
  6. Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):334-41 - PubMed
  7. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13 - PubMed
  8. J Med Humanit. 2018 Sep;39(3):275-283 - PubMed
  9. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Apr 15;122(8):599-606 - PubMed
  10. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Nov 03;12:10493 - PubMed
  11. Acad Med. 2004 Apr;79(4):351-6 - PubMed
  12. J Interprof Care. 2010 Jul;24(4):401-11 - PubMed
  13. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(9-10):811-5 - PubMed
  14. J Nurs Manag. 2018 Oct;26(7):810-819 - PubMed
  15. Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Apr;14(1):47-55 - PubMed
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):64-8 - PubMed
  17. Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):438-41 - PubMed
  18. Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S128-37 - PubMed
  19. Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1669-71 - PubMed
  20. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):536-541 - PubMed
  21. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Feb;8(1):52-59 - PubMed
  22. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Apr;5(2):73-77 - PubMed
  23. Neurology. 2019 Feb 19;92(8):e879-e883 - PubMed
  24. Med Humanit. 2017 Sep;43(3):199-203 - PubMed
  25. Med Teach. 2016 May;38(5):525-8 - PubMed
  26. Bull Hist Med. 2003 Fall;77(3):536-75 - PubMed
  27. Acad Med. 2018 Jun;93(6):888-894 - PubMed
  28. JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1532-1534 - PubMed
  29. Med Educ. 2016 May;50(5):581-2 - PubMed
  30. BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 5;17(1):108 - PubMed
  31. Virtual Mentor. 2007 Aug 01;9(8):543-6 - PubMed
  32. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):355-6 - PubMed
  33. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e280-5 - PubMed
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jan 2;134(1):83-7 - PubMed
  35. J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Dec;2(4):610-5 - PubMed
  36. Med Teach. 2012;34(12):e813-9 - PubMed
  37. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142 - PubMed
  38. Rev Med Chil. 2012 May;140(5):659-66 - PubMed
  39. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):242-7 - PubMed
  40. J Med Humanit. 2013 Dec;34(4):415-28 - PubMed
  41. Clin Teach. 2013 Aug;10(4):242-5 - PubMed
  42. JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1897-902 - PubMed
  43. Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1105-1106 - PubMed
  44. Gates Open Res. 2018 Jun 11;2:4 - PubMed
  45. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1198-1203 - PubMed
  46. Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Sep 12;5(3): - PubMed
  47. Acta Med Port. 2016 Dec 30;29(12):790-792 - PubMed
  48. J Int Med Res. 2018 Aug;46(8):3306-3317 - PubMed
  49. Acad Med. 1995 Sep;70(9):787-94 - PubMed
  50. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 04;14:183 - PubMed
  51. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):732-41 - PubMed
  52. Acad Med. 2017 Dec;92(12):1665-1667 - PubMed
  53. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Oct;58(4):696-706 - PubMed
  54. Med Educ. 2012 Nov;46(11):1112-3 - PubMed
  55. Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):352-61 - PubMed
  56. J Med Humanit. 2015 Dec;36(4):269-89 - PubMed
  57. Health Commun. 2020 Feb;35(2):257-261 - PubMed
  58. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(7):1025-8 - PubMed
  59. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Aug 16;11:20 - PubMed
  60. Presse Med. 2013 Jan;42(1):e1-8 - PubMed
  61. Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):14-7 - PubMed
  62. Virtual Mentor. 2006 May 01;8(5):315-8 - PubMed
  63. mBio. 2017 Dec 19;8(6): - PubMed
  64. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Sep - Oct;42:e2-e9 - PubMed
  65. BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 14;6(7):e011220 - PubMed
  66. Acad Med. 2016 Jun;91(6):772-7 - PubMed
  67. Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Aug;1(3):143-54 - PubMed
  68. Perm J. 2018 Apr 18;22: - PubMed
  69. J Palliat Care. 2020 Apr;35(2):127-132 - PubMed
  70. Teach Learn Med. 2009 Jul;21(3):248-53 - PubMed
  71. JAMA. 2019 Oct 1;322(13):1238-1239 - PubMed
  72. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128 Suppl 1:27S-33S - PubMed
  73. Med Teach. 2019 Jul;41(7):802-810 - PubMed
  74. Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8 - PubMed
  75. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):280-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types