Display options
Share it on

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Jan;31(1):124-131. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0661. Epub 2021 Nov 04.

TP53 Pathway Function, Estrogen Receptor Status, and Breast Cancer Risk Factors in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology

Amber N Hurson, Mustapha Abubakar, Alina M Hamilton, Kathleen Conway, Katherine A Hoadley, Michael I Love, Andrew F Olshan, Charles M Perou, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Melissa A Troester

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  2. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI, Rockville, Maryland.
  3. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  4. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  5. Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  6. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  7. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. [email protected].

PMID: 34737209 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0661

Abstract

BACKGROUND: TP53 and estrogen receptor (ER) both play essential roles in breast cancer development and progression, with recent research revealing cross-talk between TP53 and ER signaling pathways. Although many studies have demonstrated heterogeneity of risk factor associations across ER subtypes, associations by TP53 status have been inconsistent.

METHODS: This case-case analysis included incident breast cancer cases (47% Black) from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993-2013). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples were classified for TP53 functional status (mutant-like/wild-type-like) using a validated RNA signature. For IHC-based TP53 status, mutant-like was classified as at least 10% positivity. We used two-stage polytomous logistic regression to evaluate risk factor heterogeneity due to RNA-based TP53 and/or ER, adjusting for each other and for PR, HER2, and grade. We then compared this with the results when using IHC-based TP53 classification.

RESULTS: The RNA-based classifier identified 55% of tumors as TP53 wild-type-like and 45% as mutant-like. Several hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, age at menopause, and pre- and postmenopausal body mass index) were associated with TP53 mutant-like status, whereas reproductive factors (age at first birth and parity) and smoking were associated with ER status. Multiparity was associated with both TP53 and ER. When classifying TP53 status using IHC methods, no associations were observed with TP53. Associations observed with RNA-based TP53 remained after accounting for basal-like subtype.

CONCLUSIONS: This case-case study found breast cancer risk factors associated with RNA-based TP53 and ER.

IMPACT: RNA-based TP53 and ER represent an emerging etiologic schema of interest in breast cancer prevention research.

©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL, Couch FJ, Nevanlinna H, Milne RL, et al. Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:250–63. - PubMed
  2. Ambrosone CB, Zirpoli G, Ruszczyk M, Shankar J, Hong CC, McIlwain D, et al. Parity and breastfeeding among African-American women: differential effects on breast cancer risk by estrogen receptor status in the Women's Circle of Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25:259–65. - PubMed
  3. Aktipis CA, Ellis BJ, Nishimura KK, Hiatt RA. Modern reproductive patterns associated with estrogen receptor positive but not negative breast cancer susceptibility. Evol Med Public Health. 2014;2015:52–74. - PubMed
  4. Anderson WF, Pfeiffer RM, Wohlfahrt J, Ejlertsen B, Jensen MB, Kroman N. Associations of parity-related reproductive histories with ER± and HER2± receptor-specific breast cancer aetiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:86–95. - PubMed
  5. Figueroa JD, Davis Lynn BC, Edusei L, Titiloye N, Adjei E, Clegg‐Lamptey JN, et al. Reproductive factors and risk of breast cancer by tumor subtypes among Ghanaian women: A population-based case–control study. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:1535–47. - PubMed
  6. Benefield HC, Zirpoli GR, Allott EH, Shan Y, Hurson AN, Omilian AR, et al. Epidemiology of basal-like and luminal breast cancers among black women in the AMBER consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30:71–79. - PubMed
  7. Brouckaert O, Rudolph A, Laenen A, Keeman R, Bolla MK, Wang Q, et al. Reproductive profiles and risk of breast cancer subtypes: a multi-center case-only study. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19:119. - PubMed
  8. Gaudet MM, Gierach GL, Carter BD, Luo J, Milne RL, Weiderpass E, et al. Pooled analysis of nine cohorts reveals breast cancer risk factors by tumor molecular subtype. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6011–21. - PubMed
  9. Lambertini M, Santoro L, Del Mastro L, Nguyen B, Livraghi L, Ugolini D, et al. Reproductive behaviors and risk of developing breast cancer according to tumor subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;49:65–76. - PubMed
  10. Holm J, Eriksson L, Ploner A, Eriksson M, Rantalainen M, Li J, et al. Assessment of breast cancer risk factors reveals subtype heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 2017;77:3708–17. - PubMed
  11. Ma H, Wang Y, Sullivan-Halley J, Weiss L, Marchbanks PA, Spirtas R, et al. Use of four biomarkers to evaluate the risk of breast cancer subtypes in the women's contraceptive and reproductive experiences study. Cancer Res. 2010;70:575–87. - PubMed
  12. Kwan ML, Bernard PS, Kroenke CH, Factor RE, Habel LA, Weltzien EK, et al. Breastfeeding, PAM50 tumor subtype, and breast cancer prognosis and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:djv087. - PubMed
  13. Kwan ML, Kroenke CH, Sweeney C, Bernard PS, Weltzien EK, Castillo A, et al. Association of high obesity with PAM50 breast cancer intrinsic subtypes and gene expression. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:278. - PubMed
  14. Begg CB, Zabor EC, Bernstein JL, Bernstein L, Press MF, Seshan VE. A conceptual and methodological framework for investigating etiologic heterogeneity. Stat Med. 2013;32:5039–52. - PubMed
  15. Benefield HC, Zabor EC, Shan Y, Allott EH, Begg CB, Troester MA. Evidence for etiologic subtypes of breast cancer in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28:1784–91. - PubMed
  16. Coates AS, Millar EK, O'Toole SA, Molloy TJ, Viale G, Goldhirsch A, et al. Prognostic interaction between expression of p53 and estrogen receptor in patients with node-negative breast cancer: results from IBCSG Trials VIII and IX. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R143. - PubMed
  17. Berger C, Qian Y, Chen X. The p53-estrogen receptor loop in cancer. Curr Mol Med. 2013;13:1229–40. - PubMed
  18. Caleffi M, Teague MW, Jensen RA, Vnencak-Jones CL, Dupont WD, Parl FF. p53 gene mutations and steroid receptor status in breast cancer. Clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic assessment. Cancer. 1994;73:2147–56. - PubMed
  19. Silwal-Pandit L, Vollan HKM, Chin S-F, Rueda OM, McKinney S, Osako T, et al. TP53 mutation spectrum in breast cancer is subtype specific and has distinct prognostic relevance. Clinical Cancer Res. 2014;20:3569–80. - PubMed
  20. Bailey ST, Shin H, Westerling T, Liu XS, Brown M. Estrogen receptor prevents p53-dependent apoptosis in breast cancer. PNAS. 2012;109:18060–5. - PubMed
  21. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4855–78. - PubMed
  22. Macgeoch C, Barnes DM, Newton JA, Mohammed S, Hodgson SV, Ng M, et al. p53 protein detected by immunohistochemical staining is not always mutant. Dis Markers. 1993;11:239–50. - PubMed
  23. Tsuda H, Hirohashi S. Association among p53 gene mutation, nuclear accumulation of the p53 protein and aggressive phenotypes in breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 1994;57:498–503. - PubMed
  24. Chatterjee N. A two-stage regression model for epidemiological studies with multivariate disease classification data. J Am Statist Assoc. 2004;99:127–38. - PubMed
  25. Zhang H, Zhao N, Ahearn TU, Wheeler W, García-Closas M, Chatterjee N. A mixed-model approach for powerful testing of genetic associations with cancer risk incorporating tumor characteristics. Biostatistics. 2020;22:772–88. - PubMed
  26. Troester MA, Herschkowitz JI, Oh DS, He X, Hoadley KA, Barbier CS, et al. Gene expression patterns associated with p53 status in breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:276. - PubMed
  27. Newman B, Moorman PG, Millikan R, Qaqish BF, Geradts J, Aldrich TE, et al. The Carolina Breast Cancer Study: integrating population-based epidemiology and molecular biology. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995;35:51–60. - PubMed
  28. Bhattacharya A, García-Closas M, Olshan AF, Perou CM, Troester MA, Love MI. A framework for transcriptome-wide association studies in breast cancer in diverse study populations. Genome Biol. 2020;21:42. - PubMed
  29. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006;295:2492–502. - PubMed
  30. Millikan RC, Newman B, Tse C-K, Moorman PG, Conway K, Smith LV, et al. Epidemiology of basal-like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109:123–39. - PubMed
  31. Allott EH, Cohen SM, Geradts J, Sun X, Khoury T, Bshara W, et al. Performance of three-biomarker immunohistochemistry for intrinsic breast cancer subtyping in the AMBER consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25:470–8. - PubMed
  32. Williams LA, Butler EN, Sun X, Allott EH, Cohen SM, Fuller AM, et al. TP53 protein levels, RNA-based pathway assessment, and race among invasive breast cancer cases. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018;4:13. - PubMed
  33. Furberg H, Millikan RC, Geradts J, Gammon MD, Dressler LG, Ambrosone CB, et al. Environmental factors in relation to breast cancer characterized by p53 protein expression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:829–35. - PubMed
  34. Troester MA, Sun X, Allott EH, Geradts J, Cohen SM, Tse C-K, et al. Racial differences in PAM50 subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:176–82. - PubMed
  35. Bhattacharya A, Hamilton AM, Furberg H, et al. An approach for normalization and quality control for NanoString RNA expression data. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22:bbaa163. - PubMed
  36. Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MCU, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1160–7. - PubMed
  37. Conway K, Edmiston SN, Cui L, Drouin SS, Pang J, He M, et al. Prevalence and spectrum of p53 mutations associated with smoking in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:1987–95. - PubMed
  38. Baker L, Quinlan PR, Patten N, Ashfield A, Birse-Stewart-Bell LJ, McCowan C, et al. p53 mutation, deprivation and poor prognosis in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:719–26. - PubMed
  39. Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Rosenberg L. A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1795–802. - PubMed
  40. Schoemaker MJ, Nichols HB, Wright LB, Brook MN, Jones ME, et al. Association of body mass index and age with subsequent breast cancer risk in premenopausal women. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e181771. - PubMed
  41. Palmer JR, Viscidi E, Troester MA, Hong C-C, Schedin P, Bethea TN, et al. Parity, lactation, and breast cancer subtypes in African American women: results from the AMBER Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju237. - PubMed
  42. Warner ET, Tamimi RM, Boggs DA, Rosner B, Rosenberg L, Colditz GA, et al. Estrogen receptor positive tumors: do reproductive factors explain differences in incidence between black and white women?. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24:731–9. - PubMed
  43. Bertrand KA, Bethea TN, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L, Palmer JR. Differential patterns of risk factors for early-onset breast cancer by ER status in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26:270–7. - PubMed
  44. Palmer JR, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Ambrosone CB, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L. Parity and lactation in relation to estrogen receptor negative breast cancer in African American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1883–91. - PubMed
  45. Gammon MD, Hibshoosh H, Terry MB, Bose S, Schoenberg JB, Brinton LA, et al. Cigarette smoking and other risk factors in relation to p53 expression in breast cancer among young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:255–63. - PubMed
  46. van der Kooy K, Rookus MA, Peterse HL, van Leeuwen FE. p53 protein overexpression in relation to risk factors for breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:924–33. - PubMed
  47. Furberg H, Millikan RC, Geradts J, Gammon MD, Dressler LG, Ambrosone CB, et al. Reproductive factors in relation to breast cancer characterized by p53 protein expression (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:609–18. - PubMed
  48. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. - PubMed
  49. Abubakar M, Guo C, Koka H, Sung H, Shao N, Guida J, et al. Clinicopathological and epidemiological significance of breast cancer subtype reclassification based on p53 immunohistochemical expression. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:20. - PubMed
  50. Abubakar M, Chang-Claude J, Ali HR, Chatterjee N, Coulson P, Daley F, et al. Etiology of hormone receptor positive breast cancer differs by levels of histologic grade and proliferation. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:746–57. - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support