JAMA Surg. 2013 Oct;148(10):915-22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2144.
Impact of objectively assessing surgeons' teaching on effective perioperative instructional behaviors.
JAMA surgery
Cheryl I Anderson, Rama N Gupta, Joseph R Larson, Omar I Abubars, Andrew J Kwiecien, Alexander D Lake, Ahmed E Hozain, Adam Tanious, Trevor O'Brien, Marc D Basson
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Surgery, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
PMID: 23945792
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2144
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Advancing surgical technology and decreasing resident learning hours have limited exposure to perioperative training, necessitating more effective and efficient perioperative teaching by faculty surgeons. Participation in collaborative efforts and process improvement can change behaviors and enhance teaching.
OBJECTIVES: To promote deliberate teaching of residents, change resident perception of their teachers, and produce sustainable improvements by objectively measuring surgeons' perioperative teaching performance.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 3-phase observational study of surgeons' perioperative teaching behaviors included university-based surgeons, general surgery residents, and preclinical student observers and involved elective cases at a 600+ bed tertiary hospital. Initially, we measured teaching behaviors by surgeons unaware of study objectives, provided aggregate and confidential individual feedback, and developed standardized preoperative briefings and postoperative debriefings. Phase 2 applied a deliberate teaching model and reinforced behaviors with continuous process improvement efforts (Plan, Do, Check, Act) and repeat observations. Phase 3 used resident prompts to enhance teaching behaviors and demonstrate sustainability. Resident surveys conducted 3 times assessed perceptions of deliberate guidance by faculty when compared with national benchmarks.
INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of deliberate faculty preprocedural focusing and postprocedural reinforcement to facilitate resident learning.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: More frequent and complete perioperative teaching by faculty and the perception of enhanced teaching by residents.
RESULTS: Faculty more commonly and more completely performed the 10-step preoperative briefings and postoperative debriefings (P < .001) during phase 2 (250% improvement over baseline). Intraoperative teaching styles significantly improved and residents' survey-reported assessments of faculty teaching improved over national data for describing procedural steps (P = .02) and requests for resident self-evaluation (P = .006).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Objective recording of teaching behavior frequency motivated adoption of deliberate guided teaching behaviors by surgeons, resulting in both subjective reports by residents of more frequent teaching and objective recording of parallel improvements. A deliberate focus on objectively assessing surgeon educators' periprocedural teaching may motivate improved teaching.
MeSH terms
Publication Types
