Display options
Share it on

BMC Med Educ. 2015 Jun 18;15:106. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0391-5.

Voluntary peer-led exam preparation course for international first year students: Tutees' perceptions.

BMC medical education

Daniel Huhn, Wolfgang Eckart, Kianush Karimian-Jazi, Ali Amr, Wolfgang Herzog, Christoph Nikendei

Affiliations

  1. Department for General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thibautstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. [email protected].
  2. Institute for History and Ethics in Medicine, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. [email protected].
  3. Tutors of Heidelberg's Tutorial for International Medical Students (HeiTiMed), Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. [email protected].
  4. Tutors of Heidelberg's Tutorial for International Medical Students (HeiTiMed), Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. [email protected].
  5. Department for General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thibautstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. [email protected].
  6. Department for General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thibautstraße 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. [email protected].

PMID: 26084490 PMCID: PMC4477474 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0391-5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the number of international students has increased over the last decade, such students face diverse challenges due to language and cultural barriers. International medical students suffer from personal distress and a lack of support. Their performance is significantly lower than non-international peers in clinical examinations. We investigated whether international students benefit from a peer-led exam preparation course.

METHODS: An exam preparation course was designed, and relevant learning objectives were defined. Two evaluations were undertaken: Using a qualitative approach, tutees (N = 10) were asked for their thoughts and comments in a semi-structured interview at the end of the semester. From a quantitative perspective, all participants (N = 22) were asked to complete questionnaires at the end of each course session.

RESULTS: International students reported a range of significant benefits from the course as they prepared for upcoming exams. They benefited from technical and didactic, as well as social learning experiences. They also considered aspects of the tutorial's framework helpful.

CONCLUSION: Social and cognitive congruence seem to be the key factors to success within international medical students' education. If tutors have a migration background, they can operate as authentic role models. Furthermore, because they are still students themselves, they can offer support using relevant and understandable language.

References

  1. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011 Jun 23;2:157-72 - PubMed
  2. Med Teach. 2006 Feb;28(1):64-9 - PubMed
  3. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):553-7 - PubMed
  4. Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;38(1):20-8 - PubMed
  5. Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):521-6 - PubMed
  6. J Natl Med Assoc. 1994 May;86(5):373-7 - PubMed
  7. J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):85-94 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):952-7 - PubMed
  9. Med Educ. 2010 Aug;44(8):786-94 - PubMed
  10. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):496-500 - PubMed
  11. BMJ. 1998 Oct 24;317(7166):1111-6; discussion 1116-7 - PubMed
  12. Clin Anat. 1997;10(2):112-7 - PubMed
  13. Med Educ. 2005 Nov;39(11):1126-8 - PubMed
  14. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):607-16 - PubMed
  15. BMJ. 1992 Jul 11;305(6845):92-4 - PubMed
  16. Med Teach. 2004 Mar;26(2):150-9 - PubMed
  17. Med Teach. 2006 Mar;28(2):117-28 - PubMed
  18. Med Teach. 2005 Aug;27(5):439-44 - PubMed
  19. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2008;102(10):654-61 - PubMed
  20. Med J Aust. 1998 Jul 20;169(2):103-5 - PubMed
  21. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015;32(1):Doc9 - PubMed
  22. Med Educ. 2004 Feb;38(2):187-98 - PubMed
  23. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 - PubMed
  24. Med Educ. 2009 Feb;43(2):113-20 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):478-9 - PubMed
  26. Acad Med. 1995 Aug;70(8):708-14 - PubMed
  27. Med Educ. 2000 Jan;34(1):23-9 - PubMed
  28. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):583-90 - PubMed
  29. Med Teach. 2007 Sep;29(6):546-52 - PubMed
  30. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014;31(3):Doc29 - PubMed
  31. Psychosoc Med. 2011;8:Doc07 - PubMed
  32. J Psychol. 2007 May;141(3):263-80 - PubMed
  33. BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):800-3 - PubMed
  34. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):361-72 - PubMed
  35. BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):82-5 - PubMed
  36. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):392-7 - PubMed
  37. BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:11 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types